E io rilancio

Questo è Briffa che scrive a Mann

http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=136&filename=938018124.txt

I know there is pressure to present a
>nice tidy story as regards ‘apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand
>years or more in the proxy data’ but in reality the situation is not quite
>so simple. We don’t have a lot of proxies that come right up to date and
>those that do (at least a significant number of tree proxies ) some
>unexpected changes in response that do not match the recent warming. I do
>not think it wise that this issue be ignored in the chapter.
> For the record, I do believe that the proxy data do show unusually
>warm conditions in recent decades. I am not sure that this unusual warming
>is so clear in the summer responsive data. I believe that the recent warmth
>was probably matched about 1000 years ago. I do not believe that global
>mean annual temperatures have simply cooled progressively over thousands of
>years as Mike appears to and I contend that that there is strong evidence
>for major changes in climate over the Holocene (not Milankovich) that
>require explanation and that could represent part of the current or future
>background variability of our climate. I think the Venice meeting will be
>a good place to air these isssues.
> Finally I appologise for this rather self-indulgent ramble, but I
>thought I may as well voice these points to you . I too would be happy to
>go through the recent draft of the chapter when it becomes available

In cui il Briffa parla di pressioni per affermare che non c’è stato mai un riscaldamento simile a quello dell’ultimo periodo….
Tanto che anch’io come il Morabito pensavo che la talpa fosse il Briffa o qualcuno a lui vicino, colpito da una crisi di coscienza
La domanda è secca e non ammetto scappatoie: chi è secondo voi a far pressione su Mann e Jones per far sparire il periodo caldo e poter dire che l’attuale riscaldamento non ha precedenti e quindi non può che essere dovuto all’uomo.?

e perchè ?

e se questa è scienza?