Ah, please ask them to report the result of the same analysis (after correcting the problem I encountered) with their station data: so to show the averages of tmin, tmax, th8, th14, th20 compared to integration method and NOAA method means. That are the comparisons useful for the interpretation of the 1985 article.
But don't forget to declare to us your academic affiliation (or your professional activity in climatology), your academic title in climatology, the institution that released it, the year, and the doctoral (or MA or BA) committe approving you.
Please declare your qualifications. I challenge you to report them. We have clear signals of total lack of ability of interpreting climatological data from you and we begin suspecting that you boasted of an academic qualification in climatology you actually have not.
Segnalibri