Why do you keep on repeating the same thing over and over?And why should I follow your logic?
Look at how I discredit your Nobel Analysis doing a comparison of urban locations in Seville and Athens that you like so much.
And because I am very intruiged honestlyI will discredit your claims of a biased methodology of Athens Observatory from the Observatory itself.Honestly it has made me curious to show how your analysis is discredited by the observatory of Athens itself.
But let me first finish with Seville-Athens comparison to see again how once more you shot your self on the footsince you love so much the davis junk stations
It is the station that Sevilla kicked the ass last year despite of the disadvantage due to the fact that the Athens station is in the heart of the urban heat island and Sevilla airport is not.
Once again I you show null ability in iterpreting climatological data, so I challenge you to declare your academic affiliation (or your professional activity in climatology), your academic title in climatology, the institution that released it, the year, and the doctoral (or MA or BA) committe approving you.
Please declare your qualifications. We begin suspecting that you boasted of an academic qualification in climatology you actually have not.
Great, so they will notice the problem I have challenged you to detect and that you can't discover. They will see it and will correct it. I hope they describe it to you.
But before they give you the result, try by yourself to discover which is the problem. Give once proof that you understand climatic data. I challenge you to get it.
Apart from showing grasp of climatic data, please declare your academic affiliation (or your professional activity in climatology), your academic title in climatology, the institution that released it, the year, and the doctoral (or MA or BA) committe approving you.
I challenge you to report them. We have clear signals of total lack of ability of interpreting climatological data from you and we begin suspecting that you boasted of an academic qualification in climatology you actually have not.
Ah, please ask them to report the result of the same analysis (after correcting the problem I encountered) with their station data: so to show the averages of tmin, tmax, th8, th14, th20 compared to integration method and NOAA method means. That are the comparisons useful for the interpretation of the 1985 article.
But don't forget to declare to us your academic affiliation (or your professional activity in climatology), your academic title in climatology, the institution that released it, the year, and the doctoral (or MA or BA) committe approving you.
Please declare your qualifications. I challenge you to report them. We have clear signals of total lack of ability of interpreting climatological data from you and we begin suspecting that you boasted of an academic qualification in climatology you actually have not.
Now let's do the famous WMO stations comparison for the last decade (from tutiempo for Seville which according to Borat is the best in the world)
Let the battle begin
SEVILLE
Tmed in Luglio
2001
26.9
2002
29
2003
29.5
2004
28.2
2005
28.4
2006
30
2007
29.1
2008
28.4
2009
28.8
CLIMATE Sevilla / San Pablo - Weather
ATHENS
(with the NOAA method may I add)
Tmed in Luglio
2001
30.5
2002
30.3
2003
30.15
2004
29.7
2005
29.9
2006
28.65
2007
31.2
2008
29.75
2009
29.95
National Observatory of Athens - Weather forecasts BOLAM model (monthly bulletins pdf files)
In case someone has problem obtaining the values or does not believe me (following the extremely ''ethical'' comments of Borat about me) I can give multiple screenshots for each and every year
Now in the case of Athens those are the officials from the Observatory using the NOAA method
Whereas in the case of Seville we have the famous tutiempo data![]()
si lo ho gia letto, e non ancora adesso. Ho letto pure i suoi interventi in 2 Topics in un forum meteo spagnolo. Anche li e diventato molto maleducato, ed ha fatto confusione con dati e dicendo varie volte la non verita' come ha fatto in altri Topics nel nostro forum.
No no I am not falling to your logic of ''magic analysis'' Borat.I will just show how the Observatory of Athens uses the NOAA means for the inter WMO station comparisons.
Oh and regarding my academic qualifications.Get over it dear Borat.While a sociologist does his best to find something to grab hold that Athens is not warm...Look how PhD holders in Meteorology use their data in the Observatory
Segnalibri